Categories: Featured Articles » Sources of light
Number of views: 92350
Comments on the article: 12

DRV lamps: a popular hybrid of two different sources

 


The article talks about the popular hybrid mercury-tungsten lamps.

DRV lamps: a popular hybrid of two different sourcesSometimes lighting engineering presents surprises: an unsuccessful light source gains so much popularity that leading lighting companies are engaged in its mass production. This is about lamps of arc mercury-tungsten (DRV).

Structurally, a mercury-tungsten lamp is a discharge mercury burner similar to DRL lamps. But in addition, a tungsten spiral is mounted in series with the burner in the bulb. It is located in an external flask, in an argon atmosphere, and serves as a current-limiting element for the burner. Such a lamp does not require external ballast equipment (PRA) and can be directly installed in the lamp instead incandescent lamps.

It was this opportunity that led to the commercial success of DRV lamps. The point here is not only the poverty of enterprises in the CIS countries - the demand for this type of lamp is very high in countries with developed economies. The reason is that a huge fleet of umbrella-type lamps inherited from powerful incandescent lamps. The replacement of such lamps, especially in industrial premises, is associated not only with the lighting devices themselves, but also with the fastening systems and wiring of the lighting lines.

Therefore, the possibility of directly replacing traditional lamps with more efficient hybrid sources ensured a very high demand for DRV lamps. In Ukraine, more than 60% of purchases of high-pressure mercury lamps are in mercury-tungsten light sources.

But you need to be aware that the light parameters of such sources are much worse than even not very effective DRL lamps. The reasons and features of the operation of DRV lamps will be discussed below.

At first glance, the efficiency of a hybrid source should be higher than that of each individual source: a mercury burner excites a phosphor, and a tungsten spiral additionally gives a small but its contribution to the total light flux. In practice, the opposite is true: the efficiency of DRV lamps is 30-50% percent lower than that of DRL lamps with an inductive choke.

We will try to understand the reasons for this phenomenon. First of all, about the efficiency of the glow of a tungsten spiral, which plays the role of a current limiter through the burner. Its resistance and power are calculated from the conditions of the starting conditions of the mercury burner. At the initial ignition, the voltage on the burner is equal to two cathodic potential drops, i.e. about 20V.

As the burner ignites, the voltage on it rises to 60-70V, and on the spiral it, accordingly, decreases. Therefore, in the operating mode, the tungsten spiral shines a little better than an incandescent lamp that is turned on at half the operating voltage. But the light is shining! The second reason for the low efficiency of the DRV lamp is less obvious.

The DRL lamp burner usually operates with inductive ballast. When the voltage of the network passes through the amplitude value, the inductance begins to transfer the stored energy to the load, "pulling" the voltage on the burner. Therefore, the “platform” for highlighting a plasma column when powered by inductive ballast is about 80% of the half-voltage of the mains voltage.

But when current is limited by active ballast (tungsten helix), such pumping of energy is absent. Therefore, the duration of the glow of the burner is reduced by 25-30%. Accordingly, the luminous flux and lamp efficiency fall. The contribution of the glow of the tungsten spiral cannot compensate for this drop; it can be neglected altogether.



Therefore, DRV lamps even from leading manufacturers (Philips, OSRAM) have an efficiency of not more than 30 lm / W. For comparison: DRL lamps of these companies have a return of 40-50 lm / W. Relatively low light output and a short service life, usually not more than 4000 hours, is a characteristic disadvantage of DRV lamps. It is defined by a tungsten spiral and makes these hybrid sources disadvantageous for outdoor lighting. Replacing such lamps requires the use of towers, which increases operating costs. But the use of DRV lamps for indoor workshop lighting will continue to stimulate demand for these lamps for a long time to come.

The nomenclature of these sources is limited: lamps with a power of 160 with a base E27 and more powerful lamps 250, 500W with a base E40. Some firms offer lamps with a capacity of 700 and 1000W, but they have even more limited use.

See also at bgv.electricianexp.com:

  • Sodium lamps: dominance of the tamed chemical element
  • Incandescent lamp soft start device
  • Comparative analysis of light sources
  • T5 fluorescent lamps: prospects and problems of application
  • What is light return

  •  
     
    Comments:

    # 1 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Inductance, i.e. inductor, prevents the change of current. Accordingly, both decrease and increase. Therefore, I do not really agree with the increase in light output of a quartz burner when it is fed through a choke compared to light output when powered through an active resistance.

     
    Comments:

    # 2 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    And where to go. Search for "Cobra". Yes, it’s easier to screw a screw instead of a 500-watt incandescent lamp that stood everywhere.

     
    Comments:

    # 3 wrote: Paul | [quote]

     
     

    To be honest, I did not even know that DRV lamps are worse than DRL in terms of light output. This is new information for me. However, this will not be able to change anything, since the DRV lamps are good precisely because they can be used instead of incandescent lamps without the use of ballasts, which is very convenient. Their technical and economic indicators are fading into the background, since primary, first of all, ease of use.

     
    Comments:

    # 4 wrote: Sergei | [quote]

     
     

    For several years we have been using DRV lamps, everything is fine. Much more convenient than DRL.

     
    Comments:

    # 5 wrote: Ivan | [quote]

     
     

    drv worked for a week. drl - 8 years

     
    Comments:

    # 6 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    We changed the DRL to the DRV which, after two or three weeks, had to be changed to a similar one, which was then changed again to the DRL, and issued a new switchgear. DRV lamps are completely unsuitable for street lighting, illumination is even worse than that of the DRL 125. The authorities forced the DRV lamps to be screwed in instead of DNTs, IZU and the launcher “flew” on some LCD lamps and, for the sake of economy, forced to swing the launcher and screw in the DRV lamps. Now these lamps work like nightlights in a room compared to the remaining ZhKUShny lamps.

    It can be economically and profitably to use DRV lamps, but they are practically completely useless.

     
    Comments:

    # 7 wrote: Alexey | [quote]

     
     

    As a replacement for incandescent lamps, given the huge fleet of lamps, DRVshki will be in demand for a long time.

     
    Comments:

    # 8 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    I like them. I speak purely aesthetically. In the snow, the pinkish light looks beautiful. In the 80s, it was always surprising what kind of lamp it was, which in the beginning shines like LON, and then like DRL ... I am not a fitter, I collect street lamps, and I have a small collection. Yes, in the summer under the lantern with the DRV, it’s like on a moonlit night.

     
    Comments:

    # 9 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    How to visually distinguish a DRL lamp from a DRV?

     
    Comments:

    # 10 wrote: | [quote]

     
     

    Valery,
    Valery, look from the side of the cap through the transparent section of the lamp inside, and you will see a spiral of a conventional incandescent lamp. I needed a UV source. What was my surprise when I broke the flask and saw an ordinary incandescent lamp. Hackwork and only, it is expensive, but little use.

     
    Comments:

    # 11 wrote: Alexander Goncharov | [quote]

     
     

    The author is right. It is impossible to consider a quartz burner as a resistor. She has a complicated IVC. And best of all, it works with inductive ballast. In second place is resistive (case with DRV), in third place is capacitive.Who does not believe - read the book about mercury lighting by Fugenfirov.

     
    Comments:

    # 12 wrote: Andrew | [quote]

     
     

    A huge number of DRV lamps hung in my yard. Somewhere 20 pieces. Were out of order after a month. I was sickened by the darkness in the yard. I had to buy two spotlights under the MGL 400w lamp. I set it, waited for the evening, turned it on and was stunned. 2 minutes after switching on, everything was already lit.
    And when the lamps lit up, it was as light as day.